Talk:Extraction tools: Difference between revisions
imported>Mr.Mouse No edit summary |
imported>Mr.Mouse No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Hmm... Perhaps we should keep some consistency and alphabetize this and other pages? Post your thoughts, please. | Hmm... Perhaps we should keep some consistency and alphabetize this and other pages? Post your thoughts, please. | ||
[[User:Dinoguy1000|Dinoguy1000]] | [[User:Dinoguy1000|Dinoguy1000]] | ||
== Problem == | |||
I have no problem with this page. Some of these tools are old and never updated. What I do agree with is that the format of information is not quite established. On the one hand you want to let people know what a tool is about, and on the other hand the risk is indeed that we as authors of these tools try to sell it. One of my biggest gripes with this stuff is that there is apparently competition between authors to sell their tool instead to users instead of the tools of others. | I have no problem with this page. Some of these tools are old and never updated. What I do agree with is that the format of information is not quite established. On the one hand you want to let people know what a tool is about, and on the other hand the risk is indeed that we as authors of these tools try to sell it. One of my biggest gripes with this stuff is that there is apparently competition between authors to sell their tool instead to users instead of the tools of others. | ||
Revision as of 09:40, 24 December 2005
Hmm... Perhaps we should keep some consistency and alphabetize this and other pages? Post your thoughts, please. Dinoguy1000
Problem
I have no problem with this page. Some of these tools are old and never updated. What I do agree with is that the format of information is not quite established. On the one hand you want to let people know what a tool is about, and on the other hand the risk is indeed that we as authors of these tools try to sell it. One of my biggest gripes with this stuff is that there is apparently competition between authors to sell their tool instead to users instead of the tools of others.
It is really the downside of this business. Look, we, as XeNTaX, have been hosting the Game Request forum en the XeNTaX WIKI for a long time now, and it has become succesful because we joined hands (as authors of similar tools) instead of restricting knowledge of MultiEx Commander only. The success of the WIKI and the forum is "free advertising" for the other tools. We rely on donations to keep up the website and the forum, and if users don't donate, we can't keep it up. So, if we all just use it as advertising for our own tools, that is a shame.
--Mr.Mouse